Hi-Fi 4 Sale - Malaysia / Singapore Audio Forum & Marketplace | www.hifi4sale.net
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.







Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

440Hz.my - expanding musical horizons
Subscribe to our Feed
addtomyyahoo4 Subscribe with BloglinesAdd to netvibes
Add to Google

Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference?

5 posters

Go down

Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference? Empty Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference?

Post by mugenfoo Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:39 am

Starting this thread for vinyl-heads on tonearm & cartridge alignment geometry.

Which is your preference:
Löfgren-A aka Baerwald
Löfgren-B

Whatabout these.. :
Stevenson
Bauer
Seagrave


How about different inner radii and outer radii optimisations based on the above geometries?
mugenfoo
mugenfoo
Frequent Contributor
Frequent Contributor

Number of posts : 2668
Age : 48
Location : All over
Registration date : 2009-04-04

Character sheet
Source(s): Technics Compact-Cassette Deck
Amplification: DIY Kit 15Watt
Speakers: Pasar Road Special.

Back to top Go down

Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference? Empty Re: Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference?

Post by car o scope Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:56 pm

Wow... Looks like scientific name.
I just know that the Clearaudio kit is good.
One of my fellow hifi friends helped to fine tune a P3-24 using his Clearaudio kit.
Really appreciate his help, effort and time. Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference? Icon_biggrin
car o scope
car o scope
Frequent Contributor
Frequent Contributor

Number of posts : 1081
Age : 40
Location : Malaysia
Registration date : 2009-01-19

Back to top Go down

Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference? Empty Re: Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference?

Post by cmboy Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:00 pm

Recently fixed up a Shure M97XE cartridge to a Thorens TD166 arm, only 2 bolts and no other adjustments for arc alignment. It was spot on and threw away that Thorens protractor aside, waste of time using it.
cmboy
cmboy
Frequent Contributor
Frequent Contributor

Number of posts : 1298
Age : 44
Location : The Eagle's Nest
Registration date : 2009-03-11

Character sheet
Source(s):
Amplification:
Speakers:

Back to top Go down

Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference? Empty Re: Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference?

Post by car o scope Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:06 pm

cmboy wrote:Recently fixed up a Shure M97XE cartridge to a Thorens TD166 arm, only 2 bolts and no other adjustments for arc alignment. It was spot on and threw away that Thorens protractor aside, waste of time using it.
Oh.. you remind me of the Rega protractor that comes in the package.
car o scope
car o scope
Frequent Contributor
Frequent Contributor

Number of posts : 1081
Age : 40
Location : Malaysia
Registration date : 2009-01-19

Back to top Go down

Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference? Empty Re: Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference?

Post by mugenfoo Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:24 am

cmboy wrote:Recently fixed up a Shure M97XE cartridge to a Thorens TD166 arm, only 2 bolts and no other adjustments for arc alignment. It was spot on and threw away that Thorens protractor aside, waste of time using it.

U mean that the Thorens arm has no adjustability for cartridges at all ?

What if someone put a different brand cartridge on it? Or is that tonearm is a match made in heaven for the shure M97 ?
mugenfoo
mugenfoo
Frequent Contributor
Frequent Contributor

Number of posts : 2668
Age : 48
Location : All over
Registration date : 2009-04-04

Character sheet
Source(s): Technics Compact-Cassette Deck
Amplification: DIY Kit 15Watt
Speakers: Pasar Road Special.

Back to top Go down

Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference? Empty Re: Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference?

Post by bimmerman Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:15 am

I'm still on the Stevenson and no complains so far. The Stevenson geometry puts more bias to the inner grooves which is more prone to distortion and less bias to the outer grooves which are more forgiving. All in all a good compromise.
bimmerman
bimmerman
Frequent Contributor
Frequent Contributor

Number of posts : 901
Age : 53
Location : KL
Registration date : 2009-04-27

Character sheet
Source(s): Mark Levinson
Amplification: KRELL
Speakers: Sonus Faber

Back to top Go down

Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference? Empty Re: Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference?

Post by WongKN Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:56 am

Bimmerman, did you do that project with the shelves ?
WongKN
WongKN
Moderator
Moderator

Number of posts : 1795
Age : 62
Location : Malaysia
Registration date : 2009-01-20

Character sheet
Source(s):
Amplification:
Speakers:

Back to top Go down

Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference? Empty Re: Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference?

Post by cmboy Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:52 am

mugenfoo wrote:
U mean that the Thorens arm has no adjustability for cartridges at all ?
What if someone put a different brand cartridge on it? Or is that tonearm is a match made in heaven for the shure M97 ?

THIS arm (TP11 I think) in question is fixed and no avenue for overhang adjustment. Coincidently it was an ideal match.
No idea if it was another cartridge. I don't have a basketfull of others to experiment with.
cmboy
cmboy
Frequent Contributor
Frequent Contributor

Number of posts : 1298
Age : 44
Location : The Eagle's Nest
Registration date : 2009-03-11

Character sheet
Source(s):
Amplification:
Speakers:

Back to top Go down

Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference? Empty Re: Tonearm/cartridge Geometry. Which is your preference?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum